Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Inheritance plays several distinct but crucial roles in the representation of linguistic information in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar and other constraint-based frameworks. The primary use of inheritance is in the definition of the type signature, a specification of what counts as a well-formed linguistic object. In more recent developments of the theory, inheritance is also used to express substantive linguistic generalizations. This latter use is quite different from the original problem that inheritance was introduced into HPSG to solve, and there are other knowledge representation devices that might be more appropriate. In particular, delegation can also be used to express linguistic generalizations. The use of delegation can simplify HPSG analyses of some phenomena and can also clarify some of the issues that arise in the use default unification.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/oso/9780198712329.003.0009

Type

Chapter

Book title

Defaults in Morphological Theory

Publication Date

01/01/2017

Pages

214 - 232