Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate current target decision to delivery intervals (DDIs) for 'emergency' caesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study in a teaching hospital providing district and tertiary maternity services delivering 6000 babies per annum. RESULTS: 68% Category 1 deliveries were achieved within 30min and 66% Category 2 within 75min (26% for antepartum Category 2 deliveries). Category 1 deliveries were quicker using general rather than regional anaesthesia (21 vs. 29min, odds ratio [OR] for delivery <30min 4.2, 95%CI 1.3-14.2). 8% Category 1 and 4% Category 2 neonates were acidotic or asphyxiated. The risk of acidosis was not reduced by delivery within 30min for Category 1 (OR 0.56; 0.11-2.81), or within 75min for Category 2 (OR 2.72; 0.6-25.1). Three babies were registered with developmental impairment by three years of age; none were Category 1 deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that clinical triage is effective, with the more compromised fetus delivered more rapidly using general anaesthesia. For Category 1 deliveries a 30min target DDI is appropriate, although those born after longer DDI did not show developmental impairment. For Category 2 caesarean sections performed for acute fetal distress or concerns, failed instrumental delivery, failure to progress or placental bleeding, a 75min DDI may be an appropriate target but did not protect against acidosis, asphyxia or developmental impairment. Longer DDIs did not result in unfavourable outcomes for other Category 2 indications.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

Publication Date

12/2011

Volume

159

Pages

276 - 281

Keywords

Acidosis, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Apgar Score, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Cesarean Section, Child Development, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Triage, United Kingdom