Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: Expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp), which confers the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype, is thought to contribute to the insensitivity of renal cell cancer (RCC) to chemotherapy. The development of Pgp inhibitors for clinical application has been hampered by unacceptable toxicity at doses required to achieve adequate cellular concentration. Toremifene is able to reverse MDR and sensitise RCC to vinblastine in vitro. However, in vivo toremifene is tightly bound to serum proteins, in particular the acute phase protein alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), which may limit tissue availability. In this phase I-II study we assessed the tolerability of short courses of high dose toremifene in combination with vinblastine and evaluated the key determinants of MDR reversal in vivo. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with metastatic RCC received escalating doses of oral toremifene for 3 days every 2 weeks in combination with vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. on day 3 of each cycle. The serum concentration of toremifene, its metabolites and AAG were measured and the effect of patients' serum on inhibition of Pgp in vitro was determined. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response. Eight patients (31%) had stable disease and 18 patients (69%) progressive disease. The mean serum concentration of toremifene at 780 mg daily for 3 days was 7.82 microM [standard deviation (SD) 2.48, range 2.50 to 14.70], which exceeds that known to reverse MDR in vitro. The serum concentration of the major metabolite of toremifene, N-demethyltoremifene, which also reverses MDR, was 5.13 microM (SD 1.78, range 1.80 to 9.00). In 60% of patients the pre-treatment AAG concentration was above that known to block the effects of toremifene in vitro. However, addition of serum from patients on toremifene to MCF-7 adr cells in vitro inhibited Pgp-mediated efflux of rhodamine 123. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that short course, high-dose toremifene in combination with vinblastine is generally well tolerated and that the concentration of toremifene required to reverse MDR in vitro is achievable in vivo.

Original publication




Journal article


Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

Publication Date





27 - 34


Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Orosomucoid, Protein Binding, Rhodamine 123, Tamoxifen, Toremifene, Vinblastine