Michael Parker

• Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing.

  Horn R. and Parker M., (2017), Prenat Diagn

• Ethical Translations of Psychiatric Genomics Into Mental Health Practice: Response to Commentaries.

  Kong C. et al, (2017), Am J Bioeth, 17, W3 - W5

• How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.

  Dheensa S. et al, (2017), Fam Cancer

• Psychiatric Genomics and Mental Health Treatment: Setting the Ethical Agenda.

  Kong C. et al, (2017), Am J Bioeth, 17, 3 - 12

• Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

  Mackley MP. et al, (2017), Genet Med, 19, 283 - 293

• Returning genome sequences to research participants: Policy and practice.

  Wright CF. et al, (2017), Wellcome Open Res, 2

• Development of drugs for severe malaria in children.

  Cheah PY. et al, (2016), Int Health, 8, 313 - 316

• The genetic assessment of looked after children: common reasons for referral and recent advances.

  Parker MJ. et al, (2016), Arch Dis Child, 101, 581 - 584

• Ethical challenges in designing and conducting medicine quality surveys.

  Tabernero P. et al, (2016), Trop Med Int Health, 21, 799 - 806

• Public/community engagement in health research with men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities.

  Molyneux S. et al, (2016), Health Res Policy Syst, 14

• The ethics of sustainable genomic research in Africa.

  Parker M. and Kwiatkowski DP., (2016), Genome Biol, 17

• What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study.

  Aveling EL. et al, (2016), Sociol Health Illn, 38, 216 - 232

• Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers' Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research.

  Parker M. and Kingori P., (2016), PLoS One, 11

• Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

  Middleton A. et al, (2016), Eur J Hum Genet, 24, 21 - 29

• A global reference for human genetic variation.

  1000 Genomes Project Consortium None. et al, (2015), Nature, 526, 68 - 74

• Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence data.

  Middleton A. et al, (2015), J Med Genet, 52, 571 - 574

• Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.

  Bull S. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 225 - 238

• Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity: Informing Culturally Appropriate Data-Sharing Practice in Vietnam.

  Merson L. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 251 - 263

• Sweat, Skepticism, and Uncharted Territory: A Qualitative Study of Opinions on Data Sharing Among Public Health Researchers and Research Participants in Mumbai, India.

  Hate K. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 239 - 250

• Sharing Public Health Research Data: Toward the Development of Ethical Data-Sharing Practice in Low- and Middle-Income Settings.

  Parker M. and Bull S., (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 217 - 224

• Perceived Benefits, Harms, and Views About How to Share Data Responsibly: A Qualitative Study of Experiences With and Attitudes Toward Data Sharing Among Research Staff and Community Representatives in Thailand.

  Cheah PY. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 278 - 289

• Involving Research Stakeholders in Developing Policy on Sharing Public Health Research Data in Kenya: Views on Fair Process for Informed Consent, Access Oversight, and Community Engagement.

  Jao I. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 264 - 277

• Developing Ethical Practices for Public Health Research Data Sharing in South Africa: The Views and Experiences From a Diverse Sample of Research Stakeholders.

  Denny SG. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 290 - 301

• Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.

  Bull S. et al, (2015), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 10, 302 - 313

• Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.

  Traore K. et al, (2015), BMC Med Ethics, 16

• Research consent from young people in resource-poor settings.

  Cheah PY. and Parker M., (2015), Arch Dis Child, 100, 438 - 440

• Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature.

  Tindana P. et al, (2015), BMC Med Ethics, 16

• No expectation to share incidental findings in genomic research.

  Middleton A. et al, (2015), Lancet, 385, 1289 - 1290

• Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.

  Wright CF. et al, (2015), Lancet, 385, 1305 - 1314

• Scaling ethics up and down: moral craft in clinical genetics and in global health research.

  Parker M., (2015), J Med Ethics, 41, 134 - 137

• Research Stakeholders' Views on Benefits and Challenges for Public Health Research Data Sharing in Kenya: The Importance of Trust and Social Relations.

  Jao I. et al, (2015), PLoS One, 10

• Research consent from young people in resource-poor settings

  Cheah PY. and Parker M., (2015), Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100, 438 - 440

• Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence data

  Middleton A. et al, (2015), Journal of Medical Genetics, 52, 571 - 574

• "The one who chases you away does not tell you go": silent refusals and complex power relations in research consent processes in Coastal Kenya.

  Kamuya DM. et al, (2015), PLoS One, 10

• "When they see us, it's like they have seen the benefits!": experiences of study benefits negotiations in community-based studies on the Kenyan Coast.

  Kamuya DM. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• A qualitative study of health system barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user-fee abolition.

  Ganle JK. et al, (2014), BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14

• Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research.

  Kerasidou A. and Parker M., (2014), Res Ethics, 10, 214 - 226

• Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.

  Porteri C. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• Inequities in accessibility to and utilisation of maternal health services in Ghana after user-fee exemption: a descriptive study.

  Ganle JK. et al, (2014), Int J Equity Health, 13

• Ethical issues in the export, storage and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical research: perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and Kenya.

  Tindana P. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics—recruitment strategies for social sciences research

  Middleton A. et al, (2014), Journal of Community Genetics, 5, 291 - 302

• Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa.

  de Vries J. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy.

  Sheehan M. et al, (2014), J Med Ethics, 40, 572 - 575

• Ethics, economics, and the use of primaquine to reduce falciparum malaria transmission in asymptomatic populations.

  Lubell Y. et al, (2014), PLoS Med, 11

• Integrating sequence and array data to create an improved 1000 Genomes Project haplotype reference panel.

  Delaneau O. et al, (2014), Nat Commun, 5

• Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings.

  Cheah PY. and Parker M., (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• Online questionnaire development: using film to engage participants and then gather attitudes towards the sharing of genomic data.

  Middleton A. et al, (2014), Soc Sci Res, 44, 211 - 223

• Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: different ethical perspectives in two countries.

  Tozzo P. et al, (2014), J Med Ethics, 40, 177 - 181

• Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: Different ethical perspectives in two countries

  Tozzo P. et al, (2014), Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 177 - 181

• Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: the case of the Thai-Myanmar border.

  Maung Lwin K. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

• International health research monitoring: exploring a scientific and a cooperative approach using participatory action research.

  Chantler T. et al, (2014), BMJ Open, 4

• Pre-symptomatic genetic testing for inherited cardiac conditions: a qualitative exploration of psychosocial and ethical implications.

  Ormondroyd E. et al, (2014), Eur J Hum Genet, 22, 88 - 93

• Genetic testing of children: the need for a family perspective.

  Lucassen A. et al, (2014), Am J Bioeth, 14, 26 - 28

• Ethics and Tropical Diseases: Some Global Considerations. Some Global Considerations.

  Bull S. and Parker M., (2013), Manson's Tropical Diseases: Twenty-Third Edition, 31 - 39

• Managing misaligned paternity findings in research including sickle cell disease screening in Kenya: 'consulting communities' to inform policy.

  Marsh V. et al, (2013), Soc Sci Med, 96, 192 - 199

• Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya.

  Marsh V. et al, (2013), BMC Med Ethics, 14

• Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts.

  Participants in the Community Engagement and Consent Workshop , Kilifi, Kenya , March 2011 None., (2013), J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 8, 1 - 18

• Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research.

  Middleton A. et al, (2013), Am J Med Genet A, 161A, 2099 - 2101

• Ethical challenges that arise at the community interface of health research: village reporters' experiences in Western Kenya.

  Chantler T. et al, (2013), Dev World Bioeth, 13, 30 - 37

• The ethics of open access publishing.

  Parker M., (2013), BMC Med Ethics, 14

• An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

  1000 Genomes Project Consortium None. et al, (2012), Nature, 491, 56 - 65

• Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research.

  Dunn M. et al, (2012), Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 21, 466 - 480

• Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: is ethnic stigmatisation likely?

  de Vries J. et al, (2012), Soc Sci Med, 75, 1400 - 1407

• Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: Is ethnic stigmatisation likely?

  de Vries J. et al, (2012), Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1400 - 1407

• Sharing genomic research data: launch of an international ethics study

  Middleton A. et al, (2012), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 49, S77 - S77

• Moral and scientific boundaries: research ethics on the Thai-Burma border.

  Parker MJ., (2012), J Med Ethics, 38, 559 - 560

• Deciphering Developmental Disorders

  Wright C. et al, (2012), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 49, S18 - S18

• Catalysing collaborative research for rare genetic disorders in the UK through the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study

  Firth H. et al, (2012), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 49, S32 - S32

• 10 years of the Genethics Club: a review of the ethical issues discussed and the lessons learnt

  Parker M. et al, (2012), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 49, S22 - S22

• Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: a qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience.

  Tindana P. et al, (2012), BMC Med Ethics, 13

• Can UK clinical ethics committees improve quality of care?

  McClimans L. et al, (2012), HEC Forum, 24, 139 - 147

• Governing Biobanks

  Kaye J. et al, (2012)

• Governing Biobanks

  Kaye J. et al, (2012)

• Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in Kenya

  Parker M. et al, (2012), Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 7

• Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in Kenya.

  Lairumbi GM. et al, (2012), Philos Ethics Humanit Med, 7

• Ethical problems and genetics practice

  Parker M., (2012)

• Ethics in practice: the state of the debate on promoting the social value of global health research in resource poor settings particularly Africa

  Parker M. et al, (2011), BMC Medical Ethics, 12

• Delia Smith and the ethics committee.

  Sheehan M. et al, (2011), BMJ, 343

• Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study.

  Lairumbi GM. et al, (2011), BMC Med Ethics, 12

• Practical Ethical Aspects of Emerging Technologies

  Parker M., (2011), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 48, S22 - S22

• Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research.

  Marsh VM. et al, (2011), Public Health Ethics, 4, 26 - 39

• Prevalence of depression in granted and refused requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide: a systematic review.

  Levene I. and Parker M., (2011), J Med Ethics, 37, 205 - 211

• Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.

  de Vries J. et al, (2011), BMC Med Ethics, 12

• Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.

  Bredenoord AL. et al, (2011), Trends Genet, 27, 41 - 47

• Ethics in collaborative global health research networks

  Bull SJ. and Parker M., (2011), The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4, 165 - 168

• The politics of privacy, confidentiality, and ethics: Opening research methods: Ethical and moral dimensions of e-research

  Parker M. et al, (2010), 241 - 244

• The Cambridge Medical Ethics Workbook

  Dickenson D. et al, (2010)

• An ordinary chance of a desirable existence

  Parker M., (2010), Procreation and parenthood

• Practical guidelines addressing ethical issues pertaining to the curation of human locus-specific variation databases (LSDBs).

  Povey S. et al, (2010), Hum Mutat, 31, 1179 - 1184

• The Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) project

  Firth HV. et al, (2010), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 47, S43 - S43

• Psychosocial and ethical issues in pre-symptomatic testing for Inherited Cardiac Conditions (ICCs)

  Ormondroyd L. et al, (2010), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 47, S105 - S105

• Community engagement on the Thai-Burmese border: rationale, experience and lessons learnt.

  Cheah PY. et al, (2010), Int Health, 2, 123 - 129

• Ethical and Moral dimensions of e-research

  Parker M., (2010), World wide research, 241 - 244

• Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.

  Marteau TM. et al, (2010), BMJ, 340

• Confidentiality and sharing genetic information with relatives.

  Lucassen A. and Parker M., (2010), Lancet, 375, 1507 - 1509

• International network of cancer genome projects.

  International Cancer Genome Consortium None. et al, (2010), Nature, 464, 993 - 998

• Lay and professional understandings of research and clinical activities in cancer genetics and their implications for informed consent

  Hallowell N. et al, (2010), AJOB Primary Research, 1, 25 - 34

• Genetic testing in children and young people.

  Parker M., (2010), Fam Cancer, 9, 15 - 18

• Community engagement on the Thai-Burmese border: rationale, experience and lessons learnt

  Cheah PY. et al, (2010), International Health

• An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research.

  Hallowell N. et al, (2010), J Med Ethics, 36, 37 - 45

• Medical ethics and the undergraduate curriculum.

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2009), Clin Med (Lond), 9, 512 - 513

• Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries.

  Parker M. et al, (2009), PLoS Med, 6

• Concepts and definitions of the precautionary principle: an ethical analysis

  Parker M. and vineis P., (2009), Cutting through the surface

• Genome-wide and fine-resolution association analysis of malaria in West Africa.

  Jallow M. et al, (2009), Nat Genet, 41, 657 - 665

• Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics: theoretical justifications and practical strategies.

  Hallowell N. et al, (2009), Soc Sci Med, 68, 2010 - 2017

• Predictive genetic testing of adolescents at risk of inherited arrhythmic death

  Parker M. et al, (2009), Disclosure dilemmas

• Impact of informed choice invitations on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol

  Mann E. et al, (2009), BMC Public Health, 9

• Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

  Mann E. et al, (2009), BMC Public Health, 9

• Healthcare professionals' and researchers' understanding of cancer genetics activities: a qualitative interview study.

  Hallowell N. et al, (2009), J Med Ethics, 35, 113 - 119

• Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial hypercholersterolaemia: a commentary on the recent HFEA decision

  Parker M. and Boddington P., (2008), Clinical Ethics, 3, 145 - 148

• Whose interest? British newspaper reporting of use of medical records for research.

  Brown L. et al, (2008), J Health Serv Res Policy, 13, 140 - 145

• Ethical, legal and social issues

  Parker M., (2008), Genomics and clinical medicine

• A global network for investigating the genomic epidemiology of malaria

  Network MGE., (2008), Nature, 456, 732 - 737

• Informed consent in a changing environment.

  Boulton M. and Parker M., (2007), Soc Sci Med, 65, 2187 - 2198

• Ethnography/ethics.

  Parker M., (2007), Soc Sci Med, 65, 2248 - 2259

• Governing genetic databases: Challenges facing research regulation and practice

  Gibbons SMC. et al, (2007), Journal of Law and Society, 34, 163 - 189

• The best possible child.

  Parker M., (2007), J Med Ethics, 33, 279 - 283

• Valid consent for genomic epidemiology in developing countries.

  Chokshi DA. et al, (2007), PLoS Med, 4

• Lay understanding of cancer genetics activities in the UK

  Cooke S. et al, (2007), PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 16, 265 - 265

• End of life decision-making in neonatal care

  April C. and Parker M., (2007), Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 126 - 127

• End of life decision-making in neonatal care.

  April C. and Parker M., (2007), J Med Ethics, 33, 126 - 127

• Ways of thinking about ethics

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2007), Foundation Years, 3, 14 - 17

• DISCERN-Genetics: quality criteria for information on genetic testing.

  Shepperd S. et al, (2006), Eur J Hum Genet, 14, 1179 - 1188

• Pragmatic bioethics

  Parker M., (2006), JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 38, 572 - 574

• Data sharing and intellectual property in a genomic epidemiology network: policies for large-scale research collaboration.

  Chokshi DA. et al, (2006), Bull World Health Organ, 84, 382 - 387

• Implications of data protection legislation for family history.

  Lucassen A. et al, (2006), BMJ, 332, 299 - 301

• Problem cases in medical ethics

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2005), Medicine, 33, 22 - 24

• Genetic screening and occupational and environmental exposures.

  Vineis P. et al, (2005), Occup Environ Med, 62, 657 - 597

• Are "Ethics Guidelines" helpful in taking critical treatment decisions? A comparative casuistic analysis of German, British, and Swiss Guidelines regarding Palliative Care

  Bartels S. et al, (2005), Ethik in der Medizin, 17, 191 - 205

• When is research on patient records without consent ethical?

  Parker M., (2005), J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, 183 - 186

• Dilemma still not resolved

  Lucassen A. and Parker M., (2005), EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 13, 399 - 400

• The welfare of the child.

  Parker M., (2005), Hum Fertil (Camb), 8, 13 - 17

• Children, family and the state.

  Parker M., (2005), PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 55, 148 - 150

• Case analysis in clinical ethics

  Ashcroft R., (2005)

• A deliberative approach to clinical bioethics

  Parker M., (2005), Clinical Bioethics: A Search for the Foundations, 26, 61 - 71

• Getting ethics into practice [1] (multiple letters)

  Curtis H. et al, (2004), British Medical Journal, 329

• Tailored medicine: whom will it fit? The ethics of patient and disease stratification.

  Smart A. et al, (2004), Bioethics, 18, 322 - 342

• 'Til death us do part: the ethics of postmortem gamete donation.

  Parker MJ., (2004), J Med Ethics, 30, 387 - 388

• Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders.

  Parker M. et al, (2004), BMJ, 329, 288 - 289

• Getting ethics into practice.

  Parker MJ., (2004), BMJ, 329

• Genetic information: a joint account?

  Parker M. and Lucassen AM., (2004), BMJ, 329, 165 - 167

• Ethics in practice - Genetic information: a joint account?

  Parker M. and Lucassen A., (2004), BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 329, 165 - 167

• Role of next of kin in accessing health records of deceased relatives.

  Lucassen AM. et al, (2004), BMJ, 328, 952 - 953

• Ways of thinking about ethics

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2004), Psychiatry, 3, 33 - 35

• Consent to HIV testing and consequentialism in health care ethics.

  Parker M., (2004), HEC Forum, 16, 45 - 52

• Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics - preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives.

  Lucassen A. and Parker M., (2004), Eur J Hum Genet, 12, 93 - 97

• Genethics club

  Lucassen A. et al, (2003), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 40, S35 - S35

• Ethical issues in the new genetics

  Almond B. and Parker M., (2003)

• Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics.

  Parker M. and Lucassen A., (2003), J Med Ethics, 29, 70 - 73

• Informed decision making for cancer screening--not all of the ethical issues have been considered.

  Millett C. and Parker M., (2003), Cytopathology, 14, 3 - 4

• The Cambridge medical ethics workbook

  Parker M., (2003)

• Working towards ethical management of genetic testing.

  Parker M. and Lucassen A., (2002), Lancet, 360, 1685 - 1688

• Pro/con ethics debate: should mechanical ventilation be continued to allow for progression to brain death so that organs can be donated?

  Parker M. and Shemie SD., (2002), Crit Care, 6, 399 - 402

• The development of clinical ethics support in the United Kingdom.

  Parker M., (2002), Not Polit, 18, 82 - 86

• Genetics and the interpersonal elaboration of ethics.

  Parker M., (2001), Theor Med Bioeth, 22, 451 - 459

• The ethics of evidence-based patient choice.

  Parker M., (2001), Health Expect, 4, 87 - 91

• What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine?

  Parker M. and Gray JA., (2001), J Med Ethics, 27 Suppl 1, i33 - i35

• Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?

  McHaffie HE. et al, (2001), J Med Ethics, 27, 104 - 109

• Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations.

  Lucassen A. and Parker M., (2001), Lancet, 357, 1033 - 1035

• Medical ethics in the 21st century (Reprinted from Journal of Internal Medicine, vol 248, pg 1-6, 2000)

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2001), JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 249, 27 - 32

• Confidentiality in genetic testing.

  Parker M., (2001), Am J Bioeth, 1, 21 - 22

• Moral problems in medicine: A practical coursebook

  Parker M., (2000), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 26, 481 - 481

• Talking about false paternity in the genetic clinic: some ethical considerations

  Lucassen A. and Parker M., (2000), JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 37, S19 - S19

• Medical ethics in the 21st century.

  Parker M. and Hope T., (2000), J Intern Med, 248, 1 - 6

• Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction.

  Parker M., (2000), J Med Ethics, 26, 160 - 165

• Ethics and community in the health care professions

  Parker M., (1999)

• The growth of understanding

  Parker M., (1995)

• The practicality and sustainability of a community advisory board at a large medical research unit on the Thai-Myanmar border

  Khin ML. et al, Health

• Recall of participation in research projects in cancer genetics: some implications for research ethics

  Parker M. et al, clinical ethics, 3, 180 - 184

• Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders

  Parker M. and The Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study None., Nature

• Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing; the Views of Clinicians, Scientists, Genetic Counsellors and Patient Representatives

  Parker M., Prenatal Diagnosis

• Inclusion of Diverse Populations in Genomics Research and Health Services: Genomix workshop report

  Mathew S. et al, Journal of Community Genetics

• Ethics in collaborative global health research networks

  Parker M. and bull S., Clinical ethics, 4, 165 - 168

• Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders

  Parker M. et al, Clinical ethics, 3, 85 - 90

Key Publications

• Ethical problems and genetics practice

  Parker M., (2012)

• Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries.

  Parker M. et al, (2009), PLoS Med, 6

• Managing misaligned paternity findings in research including sickle cell disease screening in Kenya: 'consulting communities' to inform policy.

  Marsh V. et al, (2013), Soc Sci Med, 96, 192 - 199

• Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: the case of the Thai-Myanmar border.

  Maung Lwin K. et al, (2014), BMC Med Ethics, 15

Recent Publications

• Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing.

  Horn R. and Parker M., (2017), Prenat Diagn

• Ethical Translations of Psychiatric Genomics Into Mental Health Practice: Response to Commentaries.

  Kong C. et al, (2017), Am J Bioeth, 17, W3 - W5

• How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.

  Dheensa S. et al, (2017), Fam Cancer

• Psychiatric Genomics and Mental Health Treatment: Setting the Ethical Agenda.

  Kong C. et al, (2017), Am J Bioeth, 17, 3 - 12

• Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

  Mackley MP. et al, (2017), Genet Med, 19, 283 - 293