Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for systematic evaluation of methods before their release to the market. We addressed this problem in novel homocysteine assays as part of an European Demonstration Project involving six centers in four countries. METHODS: Two immunological methods for measurement of plasma total homocysteine (P-tHcy), the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and the enzyme immunoassay (EIA), were compared with two comparison methods, HPLC and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). All laboratories performed the following procedures: (a) familiarization; (b) determination of linearity and precision by analyzing five plasma samples with interrelated concentrations for 20 days; (c) correlation using patients' samples; and (d) assessment of long-term performance. RESULTS: Both immunological methods were linear for P-tHcy between 5 and 45 micromol/L. The intralaboratory imprecision (CV) was <5% for FPIA and <9% for EIA used with a sample processor. The bias was -2% to 3% for FPIA and 2-4% for EIA used with a sample processor. CONCLUSIONS: The immunological methods provide results with little bias compared with HPLC and GC-MS. The imprecision of the assays must be considered in the context of their intended use(s).


Journal article


Clin Chem

Publication Date





1150 - 1156


Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay, Homocysteine, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Quality Control