Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes in women admitted for labour care to midwifery units with gestational or pre-existing diabetes, compare outcomes with other women admitted to the same units and describe admission and care guidance in midwifery units typically admitting women with diabetes. DESIGN: A national cohort study and a survey of practice. SETTING: We used the UK Midwifery Study System to collect data from midwifery units in the UK between October 2021 and February 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Women with a diagnosis of diabetes admitted for labour care to a midwifery unit were compared with a cohort of women without diabetes admitted for labour care to the same units. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite measure of maternal outcome reflecting the need for obstetric care (one or more of augmentation, instrumental birth, caesarean birth, maternal blood transfusion, third or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal admission to higher level care). We also investigated a number of secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 420 (0.7% (95% CI 0.67% to 0.82%) of the 56 648 women admitted to midwifery units in the study period were recorded as having diabetes, most (84%) with diet-controlled gestational diabetes. Women with diabetes were no more likely than comparison women to experience the composite primary outcome (18.7% vs 20.7%, adjusted relative risk=1.31, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.80). We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes investigated: augmentation, postpartum haemorrhage >1.5 L, shoulder dystocia, maternal blood transfusion and maternal admission for higher level care, Apgar <7 at 5 min, initiation of breast feeding and neonatal unit admission. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide evidence that selected women with well-controlled gestational diabetes may safely plan birth in midwifery units on the same site as obstetric and neonatal services. With clear admission criteria and careful care planning, access to a midwifery unit provides an opportunity to increase choice, reduce intervention and improve outcomes for these women.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087161

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ Open

Publication Date

03/12/2024

Volume

14

Keywords

Diabetes in pregnancy, Midwifery, OBSTETRICS, Pregnancy, Pregnant Women, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, United Kingdom, Adult, Prospective Studies, Midwifery, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Diabetes, Gestational, Pregnancy Outcome, Delivery, Obstetric, Infant, Newborn