Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We examined whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score questionnaire over conventionally summed scores. Data were collected on patients receiving total hip replacement surgery. Three patient groups were created according to surgery type: primary, revision, and re-revision; two groups were created according to satisfaction with surgery: very satisfied and dissatisfied. Analyses were performed to test the relative precision (RP) of Rasch scoring versus conventionally summed scores in discriminating the groups experiencing different types of surgery and level of satisfaction. At the 1-year follow-up, RP ratios favored the Rasch scoring method in both tests of discrimination. Considerable gains in precision were achieved with Rasch scoring methods when groups were compared in a cross-sectional way. Alternative approaches to scoring questionnaires should be investigated to better assess comparisons over time.


Journal article


J Clin Epidemiol

Publication Date





68 - 74


Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative Period, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome