Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions.

Bowman-Smart H. and Taylor-Sands M., (2021), Monash Bioeth Rev, 39, 82 - 102

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for "Non-Medical" Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making.

Bowman-Smart H. et al, (2021), Am J Bioeth, 1 - 18

ORPHANS BY DESIGN: THE FUTURE OF GENETIC PARENTHOOD.

Bowman-Smart H., (2021), Bioethics, 35, 23 - 30

The Ethics of Motivational Neuro-Doping in Sport: Praiseworthiness and Prizeworthiness.

Bowman-Smart None. et al, (2021), Neuroethics, 14, 205 - 215

Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Bowman-Smart H. et al, (2020), Prenat Diagn, 40, 398 - 407

The moral case for sign language education.

Bowman-Smart H. et al, (2019), Monash Bioeth Rev, 37, 94 - 110

'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing.

Bowman-Smart H. et al, (2019), Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 59, 649 - 655

Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores.

Gyngell C. et al, (2019), J Med Ethics, 45, 530 - 531

Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.

Gyngell C. et al, (2019), J Med Ethics, 45, 514 - 523

'Is it better not to know certain things?': views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications.

Bowman-Smart H. et al, (2019), J Med Ethics, 45, 231 - 238

Include forthcoming?