Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Derriford Scale, a quality of life instrument designed to assess the distress and dysfunction experienced by people who are self-conscious about their physical appearance. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey of 656 cosmetic surgery patients recruited from new referral letters and plastic surgery waiting list reports. A total of 443 subjects completed and returned the questionnaire. Of these respondents, 203 were sent a second questionnaire to assess reproducibility, of whom 155 subjects responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency and reproducibility. Face, content and construct validity were also investigated. RESULTS: The analyses led to mixed results. There was some evidence of internal consistency, but a number of items had low endorsement levels and there may be scope for reducing the overall size of the instrument. When assessed for reproducibility, the level of agreement between scores of individuals completing the questionnaire on two occasions was high, but an important systematic shift in responses was also detected. Correlations between the other health status measures and the Derriford Scale provided some evidence of construct validity. CONCLUSION: In its present form the Derriford Scale has good descriptive value, but there are some measurement problems identified in this report that need to be addressed before the scale is taken up into general use.


Journal article


Br J Plast Surg

Publication Date





380 - 384


Adult, Cosmetic Techniques, England, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Self Concept, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome