Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer is a routine practice aiming at early detection and management of local recurrences and/or distant metastases of the disease or of new primaries. Breast self-examination and periodic physical examination, mammography, and pelvic examination are the most important methods in following-up these patients. The, at one time, more popular intensive routine diagnostic evaluation (including head, chest, abdominal, and pelvic computerized tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, liver ultrasonography, bone scans, tumor markers, etc.) is not currently considered appropriate and cost-effective. However, flexibility, based on clinical judgement, is required on the part of medical staff involved in the follow-up in order appropriately to adapt the general guidelines and meet the specific needs of the individual patients. Non-specialist or non-physician models of follow-up care have been proposed as interesting and cost-effective alternatives in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Original publication

DOI

10.1080/02841860050215918

Type

Journal article

Journal

Acta Oncologica

Publication Date

01/01/2000

Volume

39

Pages

935 - 940