Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Clinicians often rely upon the cardiotocogram, a display of the fetal heart rate and maternal uterine activity (UA) over time, as a means of monitoring fetal health during labour. Fetal health can be monitored adequately only when the signal quality of the cardiotocogram is good. We propose an automated assessment of UA signal quality in order to create a confidence index for subsequent analysis of the intrapartum cardiotocogram. We use an autoregressive (AR) model of the UA to estimate the power at the contraction frequency, with high power indicative of "good" UA signal quality. 5th, 10th, and 15th-order AR models are used to assess the signal quality of 12 intrapartum UA traces as "good/medium" or "poor". We compare our results to two experts' visual assessments of signal quality. The 10th-order model exhibits the highest percent agreement rate of 62%. It also exhibits the most balanced false positive and false negative rates, where "good" or "medium" signal quality is considered a positive and "poor" signal quality a negative. The 10th-order model can therefore be used as a confidence index to reduce the errors made in the identification of uterine contractions in the UA trace and in the subsequent analysis of the cardiotocogram as a whole.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Med Eng Phys

Publication Date

11/2001

Volume

23

Pages

603 - 614

Keywords

Cardiotocography, Female, Fetal Distress, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Models, Statistical, Pregnancy, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Uterine Contraction