Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We compared the responsiveness of the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), Medical Outcome Study Short Form-Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Disability Questionnaire (FDQ), and Pain and Activities of Daily Living subscales of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) in participants with cervical dystonia treated with botulinum toxin A. Subscales of CDIP-58 were more sensitive in detecting statistical and clinical change than comparable subscales of the SF-36, FDQ, and TWSTRS.

Original publication

DOI

10.1212/01.wnl.0000249310.25427.f2

Type

Journal article

Journal

Neurology

Publication Date

26/12/2006

Volume

67

Pages

2230 - 2232

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Botulinum Toxins, Type A, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neck Pain, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Prevalence, Prognosis, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sickness Impact Profile, Torticollis, Treatment Outcome