A nudge towards better lumbar puncture practice.

Holland C., Edmond EC., Moore C., Tobert V., Klein JC., Turner MR.

BACKGROUND: Despite a body of evidence demonstrating reduced incidence of post-lumbar puncture headache associated with pencil-point (vs bevelled-edge) needles, their use remains variable in the UK. METHODS: A multimodal longitudinal intervention was performed over a 12-month period at a tertiary neurology referral centre. In addition to simulation training using pencil-point needles and an electronic documentation pro forma, a change in the default needles presented in clinical environments was performed. RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, pencil-point needle usage was minimal. Documentation significantly improved throughout the intervention period. Simulation training interventions only resulted in transient, moderate improvements in pencil-point needle usage. However, changing the default produced a marked increase in use that was sustained. No significant changes in operator success rate were found. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of wider literature on the power of default options in driving behavioural choices, changing defaults may be an effective, inexpensive and acceptable intervention to improve lumbar puncture practice.

DOI

10.7861/clinmed.2020-0201

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2020-09-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

20

Pages

477 - 479

Total pages

2

Keywords

Neurology, lumbar puncture, quality improvement, Humans, Incidence, Needles, Neurology, Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Spinal Puncture

Permalink More information Close