Angela Coulter

• Building the House of Care for people with long-term conditions: the foundation of the House of Care framework

  Coulter A. et al, (2016), British Journal of General Practice, 66, e288 - e290

• Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice.

  Coulter A., (2016), BMJ, 352

• Court judgment on consent provides spur for embracing shared decision making.

  Coulter A., (2015), BMJ, 350

• European experience with shared decision making

  Coulter AM. et al, (2015), International Journal of Person Centred Medicine, 5, 9 - 14

• Perspectives from health, social care and policy stakeholders on the value of a single self-report outcome measure across long-term conditions: a qualitative study.

  Hunter C. et al, (2015), BMJ Open, 5

• Time to deliver patient centred care.

  Richards T. et al, (2015), BMJ, 350

• User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.

  Witteman HO. et al, (2015), Syst Rev, 4

• Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions (Review)

  Coulter AM. et al, (2015)

• Patient experience and satisfaction with inpatient service: development of short form survey instrument measuring the core aspect of inpatient experience.

  Wong EL. et al, (2015), PLoS One, 10

• Offering informed choice about breast screening.

  Forbes LJ. et al, (2014), J Med Screen, 21, 194 - 200

• Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care.

  Coulter A. et al, (2014), BMJ, 348

• People with limiting long-term conditions report poorer experiences and more problems with hospital care

  Hewitson P. et al, (2014), BMC Health Services Research, 14

• Item generation in the development of an inpatient experience questionnaire: a qualitative study

  Wong ELY. et al, (2013), BMC Health Services Research, 13

• From informed consent to informed request: do we need a new gold standard?

  Moulton B. et al, (2013), J R Soc Med, 106, 391 - 394

• Validation of inpatient experience questionnaire.

  Wong EL. et al, (2013), Int J Qual Health Care, 25, 443 - 451

• Understanding and using health experiences

  Ziebland S. et al, (2013)

• Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions [protocol for systematic review]

  Coulter AM. et al, (2013)

• Core competencies for shared decision making training programs: insights from an international, interdisciplinary working group.

  Légaré F. et al, (2013), J Contin Educ Health Prof, 33, 267 - 273

• A systematic development process for patient decision aids

  Coulter A. et al, (2013), BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, S2 - S2

• Patient decision aids in knee replacement surgery.

  Jayadev C. et al, (2012), Knee, 19, 746 - 750

• Patient experiences with public hospital care: first benchmark survey in Hong Kong.

  Wong EL. et al, (2012), Hong Kong Med J, 18, 371 - 380

• Patient engagement--what works?

  Coulter A., (2012), J Ambul Care Manage, 35, 80 - 89

• Putting patients first.

  Eaton S. et al, (2012), BMJ, 344

• On the Language and Content of Patient Engagement

  Coulter A. et al, (2012), Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 35, 78 - 79

• The patient's role in preventing errors and promoting safety. In: Health Care Errors and Patient Safety

  Coulter A., (2011)

• Implementing shared decision making in the UK.

  Coulter A. et al, (2011), Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 105, 300 - 304

• Engaging patients in healthcare

  Coulter A., (2011)

• Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.

  Elwyn G. et al, (2010), BMJ, 341

• Do patients want a choice and does it work?

  Coulter A., (2010), BMJ, 341

• Election views

  Marshall M. et al, (2010), BMJ (Online), 340

• Urgent care and the patient.

  Salisbury C. and Coulter A., (2010), Emerg Med J, 27, 181 - 182

• Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.

  Elwyn G. et al, (2010), BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 341

• Do patients want a choice and does it work?

  Coulter A., (2010), BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 341

• What's happening around the world?

  Coulter A., (2009)

• Patients as decision-makers. In: Engaging Patients in Their Health

  Coulter A., (2009)

• The Patient's Role in Preventing Errors and Promoting Safety

  Ellins J. and Coulter A., (2009), 166 - 175

• Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the international patient decision aid standards instrument (IPDASi).

  Elwyn G. et al, (2009), PLoS One, 43

• Patients' expectations. In: Medical education and training

  Coulter A., (2008)

• Changing attitudes to the role of patients in health care. In: Chronic physical illness

  Coulter A. and Ellins J., (2008)

• Patient-centred care. Personal best: put the customer in control.

  Coulter A. and Redding D., (2007), Health Serv J, 117, 20 - 21

• When should you involve patients in treatment decisions?

  Coulter A., (2007), Br J Gen Pract, 57, 771 - 772

• Time for a change.

  Coulter A., (2007), Health Expect, 10, 209 - 210

• Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium.

  Holmes-Rovner M. et al, (2007), Med Decis Making, 27, 599 - 608

• Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

  Coulter A. and Ellins J., (2007), BMJ, 335, 24 - 27

• Prominent strategy but rare in practice: shared decision-making and patient decision support technologies in the UK.

  Evans R. et al, (2007), Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, 101, 247 - 253

• Patient engagement: why is it important? In: Healthy democracy

  Coulter A., (2007), Healthy democracy

• Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

  Elwyn G. et al, (2006), BMJ, 333

• Can patients assess the quality of health care? Patients' surveys should ask about real experiences of medical care

  Coulter A., (2006), BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 333, 1 - 2

• Can patients assess the quality of health care?

  Coulter A., (2006), BMJ, 333, 1 - 2

• A very British service.

  Coulter A., (2006), Nurs Stand, 20, 32 - 33

• Examining health expectations

  Coulter A., (2006), Health Expectations, 9, 1 - 2

• Patient safety: What role can patients play?

  Coulter A., (2006), Health Expectations, 9, 205 - 206

• What do patients and the public want from primary care?

  Coulter A., (2005), BMJ, 331, 1199 - 1201

• What do patients and the public want from primary care?

  Coulter A., (2005), BMJ, 331

• European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers.

  Coulter A. and Jenkinson C., (2005), Eur J Public Health, 15, 355 - 360

• Engaging patients and citizens

  Coulter A., (2005), The quest for quality in the NHS

• Shared decision-making: the debate continues.

  Coulter A., (2005), Health Expect, 8, 95 - 96

• The patient's role in patient safety: Engaging patients, their representatives, and health professionals

  Koutantji M. et al, (2005), Clinical Risk, 11, 99 - 104

• What Patients Really Want

  Coulter A., (2005), What Patients Really Want

• Full engagement in health.

  Coulter A. and Rozansky D., (2004), BMJ, 329, 1197 - 1198

• What price choice?

  Coulter A., (2004), Health Expect, 7, 185 - 186

• When I'm 64: Health choices.

  Coulter A., (2004), Health Expect, 7, 95 - 97

• Impact on society.

  Bosanquet N. et al, (2004), Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 4 Suppl 1, S69 - S73

• Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect: details of paper were incorrect.

  Fallowfield L., (2004), BMJ, 328, 1317 - 1318

• An unacknowledged workforce: patients as partners in healthcare

  Coulter A., (2004), The future health workforce, 33 - 48

• Perspectives on health technology assessment: response from the patient's perspective.

  Coulter A., (2004), Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 20, 92 - 96

• Medicine and the media

  Coulter A., (2004), Oxford textbook of primary medical care

• Information therapy

  Coulter A., (2003), Health Expectations, 6, 279 - 280

• Properties of the Picker Patient Experience questionnaire in a randomized controlled trial of long versus short form survey instruments.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2003), J Public Health Med, 25, 197 - 201

• Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care.

  Coulter A., (2003), Br J Cancer, 89 Suppl 1, S15 - S16

• Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice.

  Magee H. et al, (2003), J R Soc Med, 96, 338 - 342

• Killing the goose that laid the golden egg?

  Coulter A., (2003), BMJ, 326, 1280 - 1281

• International experience of rationing

  Coulter AM., (2003), Reasonable rationing

• Factors relating to patients' reports about hospital care for coronary heart disease in England.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2003), J Health Serv Res Policy, 8, 83 - 86

• A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia

  Kennedy ADM. et al, (2003), Health Technology Assessment, 7

• Citizen involvement in priority-setting.

  Coulter A., (2003), Health Expect, 6, 1 - 2

• Safe treatment or a shorter wait: Hobson's choice?

  Coulter A., (2003), Qual Saf Health Care, 12, 5 - 6

• The European patient of the future

  Coulter AM., (2003), The European patient of the future

• Information therapy.

  Coulter A., (2003), Health Expectations, 6, 279 - 280

• Appropriate health care

  Coulter A. and Fitzpatrick R., (2003), Handbook of social studies in health and medicine

• Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial.

  Kennedy AD. et al, (2002), JAMA, 288, 2701 - 2708

• The coronary heart disease in-patient experience questionnaire (I-PEQ (CHD)): results from the survey of National Health Service patients.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2002), Qual Life Res, 11, 721 - 727

• Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2002), Qual Saf Health Care, 11, 335 - 339

• What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement?

  Coulter A. and Elwyn G., (2002), Br J Gen Pract, 52 Suppl, S22 - S26

• The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2002), Int J Qual Health Care, 14, 353 - 358

• Patients' views of the good doctor.

  Coulter A., (2002), BMJ, 325, 668 - 669

• Whatever happened to shared decision-making?

  Coulter A., (2002), Health Expect, 5, 185 - 186

• The autonomous patient

  Coulter AM., (2002), The autonomous patient

• Measuring the experiences of health care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD): development of the Picker MSD questionnaire.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2002), Scand J Caring Sci, 16, 329 - 333

• After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

  Coulter A., (2002), Qual Saf Health Care, 11, 186 - 188

• After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

  Coulter A., (2002), BMJ, 324, 648 - 651

• Patient safety: what about the patient?

  Vincent CA. and Coulter A., (2002), Qual Saf Health Care, 11, 76 - 80

• Involving patients: representation or representativeness?

  Coulter A., (2002), Health Expect, 5

• Use of interactive multimedia decision aids - Reply

  Murray E. et al, (2002), BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 324, 297 - 298

• Measuring and improving patients' experiences: How can we make health care systems work for patients?

  Coulter A. et al, (2002), MEASURING UP: IMPROVING HEALTH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IN OECD COUNTRIES, 211 - 224

• Information or advertising?

  Coulter A., (2001), Health Expect, 4, 203 - 204

• Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care.

  Murray E. et al, (2001), BMJ, 323, 490 - 493

• Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care.

  Murray E. et al, (2001), BMJ, 323, 493 - 496

• An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups.

  Jenkinson C. et al, (2001), J Public Health Med, 23, 187 - 194

• Patient-centered decision making: empowering women to make informed choices.

  Coulter A., (2001), Womens Health Issues, 11, 325 - 330

• Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices.

  Ham C. and Coulter A., (2001), J Health Serv Res Policy, 6, 163 - 169

• Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries.

  Coulter A. and Cleary PD., (2001), Health Aff (Millwood), 20, 244 - 252

• Patients and research.

  Coulter A., (2001), Health Expect, 4

• The Future

  Coulter AM., (2001), Evidence-based patient choice

• Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal

  Holmes-Rovner M. et al, (2001), BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322, 664 - 667

• Communication and context

  Coulter A., (2000), Health Expectations, 3

• Promoting realistic expectations

  Coulter A., (2000), Health Expectations, 3, 159 - 160

• The global challenge of health care rationing

  Coulter A. and Ham C., (2000)

• Patient participation in general practice: who participates?

  Agass M. et al, (1991), Br J Gen Pract, 41, 198 - 201

• Person-centred care: what is it and how do we get there?

  Coulter AM. and Oldham J., Future Hospital Journal, 3, 1 - 3

• Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: transforming informed consent

  Coulter AM. et al, Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Recent Publications

• Building the House of Care for people with long-term conditions: the foundation of the House of Care framework

  Coulter A. et al, (2016), British Journal of General Practice, 66, e288 - e290

• Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice.

  Coulter A., (2016), BMJ, 352

• Court judgment on consent provides spur for embracing shared decision making.

  Coulter A., (2015), BMJ, 350

• European experience with shared decision making

  Coulter AM. et al, (2015), International Journal of Person Centred Medicine, 5, 9 - 14

• Perspectives from health, social care and policy stakeholders on the value of a single self-report outcome measure across long-term conditions: a qualitative study.

  Hunter C. et al, (2015), BMJ Open, 5