Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Continue

Publications

Lay Perspectives on Receiving Different Types of Genomic Secondary Findings: a Qualitative Vignette Study.

Vornanen M. et al, (2019), J Genet Couns, 28, 343 - 354

Negotiating jurisdictional boundaries in response to new genetic possibilities in breast cancer care: The creation of an ‘oncogenetic taskscape’

Wright S. et al, (2019), Social Science & Medicine

Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals' views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care.

Hallowell N. et al, (2019), Fam Cancer

Lay Perspectives on Receiving Different Types of Genomic Secondary Findings: a Qualitative Vignette Study.

Vornanen M. et al, (2018), J Genet Couns

High-risk women's risk perception after receiving personalized polygenic breast cancer risk information.

Forrest LE. et al, (2018), J Community Genet

"I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.

Vornanen M. et al, (2018), J Community Genet, 9, 305 - 314

Big data phenotyping in rare diseases: some ethical issues.

Hallowell N. et al, (2018), Genet Med

Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.

Young M-A. et al, (2018), J Genet Couns, 27, 702 - 708

Research or clinical care: what's the difference?

Hallowell N., (2018), J Med Ethics, 44, 359 - 360

Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Wright S. et al, (2018), J Genet Couns

Better governance, better access: practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure.

Murtagh MJ. et al, (2018), Hum Genomics, 12

High-risk individuals' perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations.

Hallowell N. et al, (2017), Fam Cancer, 16, 531 - 535

A pragmatic group sequential, placebo-controlled, randomised trial to determine the effectiveness of glyceryl trinitrate for retained placenta (GOT-IT): a study protocol.

Denison FC. et al, (2017), BMJ Open, 7

The Psychosocial Impact of Undergoing Prophylactic Total Gastrectomy (PTG) to Manage the Risk of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC).

Hallowell N. et al, (2017), J Genet Couns, 26, 752 - 762

Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting.

Lawton J. et al, (2017), BMC Med Ethics, 18

Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study

White D. et al, (2017), TRIALS, 18

Primary care physicians' views about gatekeeping in clinical research recruitment: A qualitative study.

Guillemin M. et al, (2017), AJOB Empir Bioeth, 8, 99 - 105

A cluster randomised trial, cost-effectiveness analysis and psychosocial evaluation of insulin pump therapy compared with multiple injections during flexible intensive insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes: the REPOSE Trial.

Heller S. et al, (2017), Health Technol Assess, 21, 1 - 278

Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study.

Lawton J. et al, (2017), Trials, 18

A qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the value of molecular diagnosis for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

Hallowell N. et al, (2017), J Community Genet, 8, 45 - 52

Load More

Include forthcoming?