Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews. OBJECTIVE: To explore, from a patient perspective, factors influencing a patient's decision-making process and the decision to have surgery for lumbar disc herniation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Since strong evidence favoring surgical over non-surgical treatment is lacking and firm guidelines regarding the optimal timing of surgery are not available, it is essential to involve patients in the decision-making process. Thus the elements that might affect the decision-making process and the decision to have surgery must be identified. METHODS: Using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach, 14 patients who were referred for primary surgery for lumbar disc herniation were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a meaning-condensation method to identify themes influencing a patient's decision-making process and the decision to have surgery for lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: Four main themes that could directly or indirectly influence the patients' decision-making process were identified: 1) Patient information: patients conceptions about treatment were not always based on sufficient information; 2) Accelerated workflows: some patients needed time to process the information given, which may be limited due to accelerated workflows; 3) Power imbalance: patients can be reluctant to challenge the system, as they do not want to offend, which can be seen as a power imbalance between clinicians and patients; and 4) Personal past experience: experience, about treatment options from i.e. close relatives, can impact patients thoughts about possible treatments. CONCLUSION: Several factors can influence patients' decision-making process and the decision itself: the amount and quality of information received as compared to their pre-conceived notions, the amount of time given to consider their decision, reluctance to challenge the system and offend the healthcare provider, and past personal experience. Understanding these complex factors will help clinicians to better support patients choosing between surgical and non-surgical treatment for lumbar herniated disc. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/BRS.0000000000002763

Type

Journal article

Journal

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

Publication Date

26/06/2018