Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Shared decision making (SDM) is firmly on the policy agenda in the UK and a recent legal ruling has confirmed its importance. Policymakers, ethicists, professional regulators and societies, patient organisations and now the courts are committed to ensuring that SDM becomes the norm throughout the NHS, but an unfavourable economic climate makes this especially challenging. Considerable progress has been made over the last few years, with new learning from demonstration sites, various initiatives in capacity building and training, wider availability of patient decision aids, and important leadership initiatives. Enthusiasm for this way of working is growing among clinicians, patients and managers, but it could be undermined if SDM comes to be seen primarily as a means of cost control.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.010

Type

Journal article

Journal

Z evid fortbild qual gesundhwes

Publication Date

06/2017

Volume

123-124

Pages

99 - 103

Keywords

Entscheidungsunterstützung, Konzeptüberprüfung, Meinungsführer, Politik, decision support, leadership, partizipative Entscheidungsfindung, policy, proof of concept, shared decision making, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Patient Participation, State Medicine