Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Many research projects depend on general practitioners (GPs) to recruit patients into the study. As part of a study of patients' experiences of treatment for menorrhagia, completeness of recruitment and the extent of bias introduced by failure to recruit was assessed. Only 129 (41%) of 315 GPs who had agreed to recruit patients actually did so. A review of notes in six practices revealed that only 40 (20.4%) of 196 eligible patients had been recruited. There was some evidence that the recruited patients had more severe symptoms than those not recruited. There was no difference in recruitment rates between male and female doctors, but those who had received a practice visit from a member of the research team recruited more patients. A survey of participating GPs revealed that forgetfulness and time pressures were the main factors inhibiting recruitment.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Fam Pract

Publication Date

06/1993

Volume

10

Pages

207 - 211

Keywords

Adult, Bias, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Incidence, Menorrhagia, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation