Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Men and women who have a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer may be offered a predictive genetic test to determine whether or not they carry the family specific BRCA1/2 mutation. The sons and daughters of mutation carriers have a 50 per cent chance of inheriting a mutation, which will increase their risk of developing cancer. Little is known about at-risk men's feelings about the part they play in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their families. This study investigated high risk men's responses to BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing. Seventeen in-depth interviews were undertaken with carrier (n= 5) and non-carrier men (n= 12). All men described genetic testing as a familial duty. It is observed that carriers and non-carriers mobilised differing explanations about their role in the aetiology of risk. It is noted that men engage in a form of narrative reconstruction in which they draw upon discourses of guilt and blame or fate and predestiny in an effort to present themselves as morally responsible or blameless. It is argued that narrative reconstruction enables these men to reconcile their genetic identity, self and family.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00515.x

Type

Journal article

Journal

Sociol Health Illn

Publication Date

11/2006

Volume

28

Pages

969 - 988

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genetic Testing, Guilt, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Men, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk, Social Responsibility, Spouses