Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The aim was to assess the quality and strength of evidence for the health benefits of specific sport disciplines. Electronic search yielded 2194 records and the selection resulted in 69 eligible studies (47 cross-sectional, 9 cohort, 13 intervention studies). 105 comparisons between participation and non-participation groups in 26 different sport disciplines were reported. Moderately strong evidence showed that both running and football improve aerobic fitness and cardiovascular function at rest, and football reduces adiposity. Conditional evidence showed that running benefits metabolic fitness, adiposity and postural balance, and football improves metabolic fitness, muscular performance, postural balance, and cardiac function. Evidence for health benefits of other sport disciplines was either inconclusive or tenuous. The evidence base for the health benefits of specific sports disciplines is generally compromised by weak study design and quality. Future research should address the health effects of different sport disciplines using rigorous research designs.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bjsports-2014-093885

Type

Journal article

Journal

Br J Sports Med

Publication Date

04/2015

Volume

49

Pages

434 - 440

Keywords

Aerobic fitness, Evidence based review, Health promotion, Intervention effectiveness, Sports analysis in different types of sports, Adult, Athletic Injuries, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Health Behavior, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Male, Observational Studies as Topic, Physical Fitness, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Running, Soccer, Sports, Swimming