Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Prostate cancer is a heritable disease with ancestry-biased incidence and mortality. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) offer promising advancements in predicting disease risk, including prostate cancer. While their accuracy continues to improve, research aimed at enhancing their effectiveness within African and Asian populations remains key for equitable use. Recent algorithmic developments for PRS derivation have resulted in improved pan-ancestral risk prediction for several diseases. In this study, we benchmark the predictive power of six widely used PRS derivation algorithms, including four of which adjust for ancestry, against prostate cancer cases and controls from the UK Biobank and All of Us cohorts. We find modest improvement in discriminatory ability when compared with a simple method that prioritizes variants, clumping, and published polygenic risk scores. Our findings underscore the importance of improving upon risk prediction algorithms and the sampling of diverse cohorts.

Original publication

DOI

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011990

Type

Journal article

Journal

PLoS Comput Biol

Publication Date

04/2024

Volume

20

Keywords

Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Male, Benchmarking, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Algorithms, Multifactorial Inheritance, Cohort Studies, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Computational Biology, Risk Assessment, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Risk Score