Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Rationing health care in publicly funded health care systems is becoming more challenging because of the growing gap between the possibility of effective medical intervention and limited resources. This poses both an economic challenge and a political puzzle. On the basis of experience in those systems that have adopted a systematic approach to rationing, it can be suggested that the dilemmas involved should be addressed by strengthening both the information base to support decisions and the institutional framework in which decisions are taken. The contribution both of experts and of lay people is needed to inform decision-making, and the processes adopted need to allow for this as well as being transparent and accountable. In practice, rationing is likely to combine explicit and implicit decision-making and to result in the exclusion of services at the margins and the development of guidelines in the mainstream. The politics of rationing may favour muddling through and the evasion of responsibility but this will be difficult to sustain in an environment in which public awareness of decision-making in health care is growing.

Original publication

DOI

10.1258/1355819011927422

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Health Serv Res Policy

Publication Date

07/2001

Volume

6

Pages

163 - 169

Keywords

Health Care and Public Health, Decision Making, Organizational, Europe, Health Care Rationing, Health Policy, Humans, New Zealand, Social Responsibility, State Medicine, United Kingdom