Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

Objectives: To evaluate response rate, data quality, score reliability and scaling assumptions of the 36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in a survey of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients recruited into the ALS Health Profile Study (ALS-HPS) in Germany. Design: A questionnaire based survey of patients diagnosed with ALS in Germany. Sample: Patients presenting at neurological clinics throughout Germany for treatment of their condition were asked to take part in the survey. Results: 355 patients were recruited, and responses were obtained from 291 (82.0%). Scores on six of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 showed high internal consistency. Energy/Vitality and General Health dimensions were the two exceptions. Items correlated more highly with their own (corrected) scale score than with other scale scores. However, on two dimensions (Role-Physical and Role-Emotional) there were high levels of missing data, and substantial floor and ceiling effects. The two factor model of underlying constructs of physical and emotional health for the SF-36 suggested by its developers was not supported in this patient group. Conclusion: The SF-36 appears to provide reliable information across most dimensions in ALS. In general, there were high levels of item completeness and a good spread of scores, but this was not true for the role functioning dimensions. The underlying two factor model for the SF-36 was not supported. The implications of these findings for measuring health status in this patient group are discussed.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Nervenheilkunde

Publication Date

01/01/2002

Volume

21

Pages

432 - 437