Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Fulvestrant, a new type of oestrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects, is now licensed in the EU and USA for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer following progression on prior antioestrogen therapy. Approval was based on data from two phase III trials that demonstrated fulvestrant was at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole as a second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. The third-generation AIs letrozole and exemestane also demonstrate efficacy after tamoxifen failure. To compare the performance of fulvestrant and contemporary endocrine treatments (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) in tamoxifen-resistant disease, we conducted a literature review using the PubMed database. These indirect comparisons suggest that fulvestrant offers similar efficacy and tolerability to other second-line treatments for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Findings from these comparisons support the use of fulvestrant as an additional second-line endocrine treatment option in this setting. New trials are assessing the efficacy of fulvestrant as a second-line treatment following AI failure. The integration of new agents such as fulvestrant into the endocrine sequence may extend the endocrine treatment window, before cytotoxic chemotherapy needs to be considered, and therefore improve patient quality of life. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.03.009

Type

Journal article

Journal

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Publication Date

01/06/2005

Volume

31

Pages

274 - 282