Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Patients attending neurological clinics with headaches that proved not to be due to clearly defined structural disease were interviewed before and after the consultation and approximately one year later. Their expectations of the consultation were ill-formed. About two-thirds of the patients had fears about organic disease although few had psychiatric morbidity. These fears were generally dispelled by the consultation. About one-third of the patients were dissatisfied by the consultation, nearly all by what the neurologist said rather than by what technical procedures he did or did not undertake. Women with a long history of migraine, with significant psychiatric morbidity, and who had initiated the referral themselves were particularly likely to be dissatisfied. Although most patients were still having headaches one year later, visits to the general practitioner for this symptom had greatly declined.

Original publication




Journal article


Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry

Publication Date





1061 - 1067


Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Headache, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Neurology, Social Class, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Female, Male, Migraine Disorders, Consumer Behavior, United Kingdom