Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.


Whilst responsibility commonly plays a role in a variety of social contexts, the appropriate role for responsibility in healthcare is debatable. Upon its launch in 1948, three core principles were to guide the NHS: that it meet the needs of everyone; that it be free at the point of delivery; and that care be based on clinical need, not ability to pay. Much has changed since then, and now chronic disease is responsible for the majority of the global disease burden. It is thought that chronic disease can often be avoided through the adoption of ‘healthy lifestyles’: quitting smoking, drinking less alcohol, eating healthily and exercising regularly. As a result, there is renewed interest in exploring how responsibility can be used to promote health. Much of this is framed as ‘empowering healthy choices’ rather than ‘punishing bad behaviour.’ This paper explores the possibility of using responsibility in this selective way, and considers the philosophical consistency of ‘holding responsible’ in the context of habitual behaviours.

Forthcoming events

Richard Doll Seminar - Adventures in Digital Health Research: Alcohol, Coffee, and Arrhythmias

Tuesday, 03 September 2024, 1pm to 2pm @ Richard Doll Lecture Theatre, Richard Doll Building, OldRoad Campus, University of Oxford, OX3 7LF