Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The routine implementation of Advance Care Planning (ACP) is now a prominent feature of policy directed at improving end of life care in Australia. However, while complex ACP interventions may modestly reduce medical care at the end of life and enable more people to die at home or outside of acute hospital settings, existing legal, organisational, cultural and conceptual barriers limit the implementation and utility of ACP. We suggest that meaningful improvements in end of life care will not result from the institutionalisation of ACP but from more significant changes to the design and delivery of care.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/imj.13389

Type

Journal article

Journal

Internal medicine journal

Publication Date

04/2017

Volume

47

Pages

390 - 394

Addresses

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Keywords

Humans, Terminal Care, Communication, Advance Directives, Health Policy, Policy Making, Advance Care Planning, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Australia